Mark Holyoake on Proper Placement of Dedication

With all the work Mark Holyoake has put into the Icelandic seafood industry, it is surprising to see how much enthusiasm he brings to his everyday life, even when he is not feeling his best. He believes that the most important thing to consider in life is how you are presenting yourself. Part of having a happy attitude is acting as though you have a happy attitude. The expression “fake it ’till you make it” was not coined for no reason, after all. Mark Holyoake is personally quite the exhibition of this principle, as he will turn any bad day into an opportunity to conquer life.

This is what generally separates other businessmen from Mark Holyoake. While others may enjoy their job most of the time, he finds pleasure even in the unpleasant moments. His thought process at the time of deciding that this was an adjustment he needed to make was that if he can manage the worst moments in his career, the best ones will be an absolute cinch, and so will everything in between. Because of this, he has determined to work himself as hard as he is possible able. He is aware that as long as he continues to pour his talents into humanity and provide what he is capable of doing to the world, he will at least feel as though he has done his best.

Something that bothers Mark Holyoake frequently is the mentality many individuals seem to have wherein they believe that their own independent actions are entirely irrelevant. To him, this could not be further from the truth. In his eyes, everyone has the power to analyze a situation, discover what can be done to improve it, and introduce that idea in a way that generates change. It is all a matter of placement and dedication.

Original source to learn more

George Soros Contends That The European Union Should Provide Assistance To Ukraine

George Soros posits that the economy of the new Ukraine has been adversely affected by the Russian aggression. This situation has seen Ukraine struggle in dealing with its creditors. However, as part of the International Monetary Fund condition, Ukraine has been negotiating with its creditors. In addition, the country has been renegotiating its debts in San Francisco.

It is imperative to note that Ukraine has no recourse to bankruptcy. In Ukraine, there is no chapter 11. This way, it is difficult for the sovereign borrowers to devise an agreement between the borrowers and lenders as well as arbitrate negotiations between these two sides and make decisions over the debts that need to be reorganized. In this situation, Ukraine’s only leverage is to issue a warning regarding its intent to default unless it is provided with debt relief. Soros contends that bondholders must be warning Ukraine that if it defaults in its obligation, no investor would be willing to invest in the country.

It is crucial to note that when a nation and its lenders devise a speedy deal, such a country is able to return to the market within a year or two. A country is not kept out of the markets because of the default but because of the economic problems that resulted in the default. It is for this reason that in 1989, Nicholas Brady unveiled the Brady Plan. Nicholas is the former U.S. Treasury Secretary. The Brady Plan sought to request banks to accept debt relief, especially for countries that are pursuing sensible reforms in Latin America. Brady understood that most investors would not focus much in the past but rather into the future in terms of lending to a nation that has defaulted on its obligations.

Read more:
A New Policy to Rescue Ukraine

Sustaining Ukraine’s Breakthrough

George posits that the Ukrainian uprising had positive outcomes. This is because citizens armed with sticks and shields made of metal garbage can lids and cardboard boxes managed to overwhelm a contingent of police force using live ammunition. Soros contends that even though there were many casualties, citizens prevailed in the end. This uprising goes into the history books as one that left a lasting imprint on the collective memory of the society. In answering how such a thing could happen, George Soros asserted that the unpredictability of historical events such as the Ukraine uprising are highly correlated to the aspect of ambiguity in human identity.

People’s identity incorporates the individual elements as well as components of larger units where they belong. Soros argues that individual’s impact on reality is dependent on the elements that dominate one’s behavior. He continues to argue that when civilians launched attacks in Kyiv, on an armed force, their spirit of defending the nation outweighed their concerns regarding individual mortality. The objective of the attacks was to inspire a sense of unity to the divided society that was on a brink of civil war. To this end, Ukrainians have proved their allegiance to the European Union. This unity is dependent on Europe’s response.

Learn more about George Soros:

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/27/opinion/bernard-henri-levi-george-soros-save-the-new-ukraine.html?_r=0

https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/people/george-soros