Renowned Legal Expert Sujit Choudhry Talks About Difference Between Free Speech and Hate Speech

After a fatal killing at a rally in Virginia a couple of years ago, there has been a debate over what constitutes hate speech. There are some people who believe that some speech and protests are a part of hate speech. With hate speech, a person or group expresses a negative opinion towards another group and threatens violence against them. Some believe that the recent events that took place at the rally constitute hate speech. However, the protesters and the counter protesters were well within their rights to express their viewpoints as free speech. As a result, the people who attended the rally were not guilty of hate speech.

 Sujit Choudhry is a well known scholar and legal expert in North America. Choudhry has many years of experience comparing legal systems of other nations as well as reviewing their constitutions. During his career, Sujit Choudhry has helped international leaders and government officials find ways to reform their legal system. One of the most significant things that he has done was help national governments devise and draft a modern constitution. This has helped these nations complete much needed legal reform. As a legal expert, Choudhry provided his perspective on the difference between hate speech and free speech. In the United States, free speech is almost unlimited unless illegal activity occurs.

For two decades, Sujit Choudhry has had a very successful career as both a consultant and as an educator. One of his most fulfilling experiences was when he was affiliated with the Supreme Court of Canada. While affiliated with the court, he was involved in interpreting the nation’s laws and evaluating its constitution. He was therefore, very active in helping political leaders and government officials get a better grasp of how the nation’s legal system functions. Sujit Choudhry would also get involved in the educational sector when he joined a couple of leading North American law schools.

Find out more here https://sujitchoudhry.com/advisory-work/

How Sujit Choudhry Supports Constitutional Law Building

Meet Professor Sujit Choudhry, a globally acclaimed scholar with vast experience in research that addresses a broad spectrum of issues surrounding comparative as well as constitutional law. He is also well versed with the application of different policies and regulations not only in business but in politics. His specialty includes the use of the constitutional design in managing the transition from disruptive conflicts to a peaceful democratic political landscape, design in divided societies, secession, transitional justice, group rights, constitutional design specifically in the platform of transitions from an authoritarian to democratic policy and constitution building processes. Sujit Choudhry is also well versed with the creation of basic methodological questions when it comes to the study and research of comparative law. Over the years, he’s written extensively on constitutional law in Canada.

Sujit Choudhry has a recent publication that discusses the outset of constitutional democracies that are in crisis. To be specific, he specializes in the discussion of Eric Holder’s tweet. Holder served in the government of President Barrack Obama. The tweet was posted in 2017, and in it, Mr. Holder reiterates that any political threat based on the termination of Robert Mueller was a red line. Holder added that in case of anything, action should be taken with immediate effect. Peaceful demonstrations should rule the day. If he’s forcefully removed from power, there must be mass action upon which the people will be voicing their opinions. In the opinion of Sujit Choudhry, Eric Holder’s tweet is solely based on two primary concepts, namely red line and the uncontroversial constitutional boundary that impacts the democracy of America. It’s also important for Holder to allow Americans to decide if officials have indeed transgressed the existing limits. Mr. Choudhry also underlines the fact that Eric Holder is insinuating the people’s reaction, including how the impending issue should be solved. This includes the red line issue and how it will be held.

Find out more here https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Sujit_Choudhry